Showing posts with label Wall Street Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wall Street Journal. Show all posts

Friday, July 28, 2017

The United States is preparing oil blitz

OPEC, however, hopes for new contracts with the Americans. The contraction of oil production under the OPEC + agreement did not lead to the so-called price increase. Saudi Arabia has targeted 60 dollars a barrel no earlier than the end of 2018, which will allow it to receive $ 100 billion in the sale of 5 percent of the state oil company. The Saudis announced these days in St. Petersburg that they are willing to make further commitments - to cut not only mining but also the export of "black gold". Russia, with some reservations, is ready to do so. OPEC + participants missed their own discipline assessments. Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak estimates 98% of the deal's execution rate in June, while Kuwaiti oil minister Esam al-Maruzuk said it exceeds 90%. When it comes to 1.8 million barrels of oil per day, the 8% difference can have a significant impact on the market. Indeed, not only weak discipline and inaccurate control have led to the participants in the agreement being dissatisfied with its results. The measures taken by the cartel to significantly increase prices have proved to be insufficient for the market. Novak said that thanks to the agreement from the market, over 350 million barrels of oil have been withdrawn for the last half year. If after the conclusion of the deal in December 2016 oil prices have risen steadily to $ 55 a barrel, they are now at the level of $ 48.
According to Wall Street Journal, quoted by BGNES, Saudi oil minister Khaled Al-Falih has held a meeting with representatives of the states that did not attend the summer holidays in St. Petersburg before the main meeting on July 24 Have cut the yield "in the right way". Nigeria and Libya, which were released from the deal, have greatly increased the yield, which greatly suppressed its cutbacks by its participants. Saudis to such an extent need the high cost of oil that they are ready to unilaterally reduce not only mining but also oil exports to 6.6 million barrels per day. Khaled al-Falih called on other countries to follow the example of the kingdom, noting that some allies in the alliance, as before, exported huge volumes of oil. The $ 60 oil is needed by the kingdom to meet its plan to sell part of Saudi Arabco's state-owned oil company. Only at such an oil price of 5% of the company Riyad will get the $ 100 billion needed. There is not much time for stock listing on the stock exchange to be planned for the second or third quarter of 2018. High oil prices are needed by all parties to the agreement for some economic or even political reasons. The Russian economy can not escape from stagnation, and in Venezuela the Petrodollars depend on the stability of the regime of Nicholas Maduro. Perhaps it was for this reason that these two countries first supported Saudi Arabia's proposal to extend the agreement after March 2018 when it expires. On Monday, there was another, almost historic speech. "At OPEC, we first reached out to US manufacturers and came into contact with them. The goal - to better understand our processes, our business models, our forecasting methodology, our mining plans, business plans to establish an energy dialogue that resembles the one we have with Russia, "said OPEC's Director General Mohamed Barkindo, revealing OPEC and US plans to discuss the current market situation in the fourth quarter of 2017. The sharp increase in shale oil production in the United States has been cited as one of the main factors that led to the equally sharp decline in oil prices In 2014. In addition, in the United States, President Barack Obama has changed the approach to energy exports: in 2015, for the first time in 40 years, oil was allowed to be exported. According to PIRA Energy Group's forecast, the increase in shale oil production will go at such a rate that it will turn the United States into one of the world's largest exporters. PIRA predicts that US exports of crude oil by 2020 will grow to 2.25 million barrels a day, four times more than exports in 2016. It is planned that US oil production will be invested in that year, Less than $ 25 billion. Americans have an interest in high oil prices: at a cost of about $ 50 per barrel, shale oil yields are profitable.
Even today's $ 45-48 per barrel mean that the number of US mining projects is down. "The US does not have such oil reserves that could provide oil demand for their own economy, so to speak that this country will become not only one of the major but also a significant exporter - , The leading expert of the Union of Petroleum and Gas Industry Rustam Tankaev told Nezavisimaya Gazeta. "The shale revolution, however, remains together with supply and demand as one of the major factors that form the price of oil. Reducing its yield means that the US will have to increase imports that are happening at the moment. And exporters take advantage of this by increasing their market share. Naturally, this does not affect Russia, "he added.

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Republicans are increasingly an obstacle to trade policies Trump

They worry that his plans may harm the exports of their states and undermine long-standing alliances US
Republican lawmakers show increasing resistance to plans for a new trade policy President Donald Trump. They worry that his plans may harm the exports of their states and undermine long-standing alliances US, writes Wall Street Journal. This shows that the biggest threat to the commercial intentions of Trump, who focus on new bilateral deals and more hard-line approach against countries that violate trade rules, comes from his party. The opposition Republicans, who control both chambers of Congress will hamper the efforts of the President to review the North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and to deal with trade distortions, which accuses China.
Republicans have long supported free trade and who are close to business groups have warned that the imposition of duties could lead to retaliation against US goods. Lawmakers from states where there is developed agriculture, are unhappy that Trump withdraw the country from Trade Partnership (TPP).
"I am more worried about what they can do renegotiating existing agreements than what they are doing bilaterally with countries with which no transactions. We know what we have and not think it's as bad as thought the president," said Republican Senator from Iowa Chuck Grassley.
Trump caused a wave of discontent, threatening to terminate traditional US trade policies and challenging orthodox Republican lawmakers who support free trade. In fact, few members of his party oppose him openly about the issue because they want to work with the president on other priorities. But as the trade policies of Trump on several fronts legislators are beginning to express reservations.
"My concern is that they make it too difficult entry into a trade agreement. When you subtract themselves from the field of multilateral opportunities, our trading partners will look elsewhere for leadership. That leadership can come from countries that do not follow the same norms and values like us, "said Republican Senator from Colorado Cory Gardner. 
Trump recently sent to Congress measures of commercial policy that supports aggressive use of a rarely used law to punish trading partners, and questioned the credibility of the WTO as an arbitrator in international disputes. Republicans responded with a strong statement in support of the organization and the existing American agreements.

Test for support

Trump intention to renegotiate NAFTA will be a test of support in Congress for its policies. US lawmakers watched carefully when Mexican lawmaker introduced a bill beneficial Latin American goods exported to the US grain. The move came as a result of warnings from Trump that NAFTA would be renegotiated and that Mexico will have to pay for the new border wall. "I'm worried because other countries Our answer: You want to build a wall, then you will not take your grain. If we talk about renegotiating NAFTA, we will actually lose in agriculture. So you really have to work very, very carefully" said Republican Senator from Iowa Johnny Ernst. According to Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah, if Trump fulfill his threats to raise tariffs, "there may be some extreme economic consequences."